TCP-Banner---Research1 TCP Home Page go to Research Home page Topics in ideology, liberty, policy, war, conflict Topics in health, media, and other industries Topics in science, secrecy, environment Topics involving 9/11/2001 listing of watchdog websites
 
The Industrial/Commercial World
Subtopics: General - Foreign Observation
           
Your Comments/Opinions - Quotes - More Quotes - Polls - Archived Polls
Description of page
Watch Playlist
What’s Here
 
You’ve heard much of this significant story through the mass media mouthpiece. Now see and hear the story from independent sources. The information here is supplied from many angles of the events which took place before, on, and after September 11, 2001. These topics range from fighter responses. to FAA and NORAD reports, to the collapsed buildings, Able Danger, the Pentagon and Shanksville crashes, eyewitness testimonies, seismology, video analysis, and much more.
 
What’s the Interest
 
This critical modern day event is the pretext to current conflicts, yet many doubts about how and why it happened persist. Many agree, including government personnel, that the abbreviated and underfunded investigations that followed the event were insufficient, and that forensic evidence was removed from the sites unlawfully. Of large concern too is the government’s official explanation as found in the 9/11 Commission Report which omitted or ignored major investigative components, in addition to the selective revision of previous official stories.
 
This event has generated a lot of post-analysis work, as measured by the volumes of writing and videos on the topic. Much private investigative work has been done, seemingly inspired by the vast amounts of questions, glaring deficiencies in federal investigations, and aspects that defy logic in “the official story”. This is a story that won’t go away for one very simple reason: it shouldn’t go away -- it’s far too mysterious.  Among the many issues with the surrounding events, there are unresolved questions such as these:
 
    How did the World Trade Center buildings collapse in their own footprints at a rate so close to the speed of gravity?
     
    Instead of any forensic testing of the steel beams, why were these illegally removed so quickly from the site, loaded on barges, and then shipped to China for recycling?
     
    Why wasn’t President Bush taken out of the elementary school in Florida even after the second WTC crash? Why wasn’t Air Force One escorted by fighter jets on the way back? These are all standard protocol during times of attack.
     
    Why did the military fail at carrying out their standard air intercept procedures until after it was too late?
     
    Tons of molten steel and concrete were found below the wreckage of all buildings. What appeared to be molten steel flowed out of the towers prior to collapsing. How is this possible when burning jet fuel or any other material in the WTC buildings cannot reach temperatures anywhere close to the melting point of steel, let alone concrete? What can melt steel is thermite or thermate based explosives used by demolition experts.
     
    Why did over 100 first responders report hearing a series of explosions (“bam, bam, bam, bam”....as it was described my many) right before the buildings collapsed?
 
These are but a few issues which conflict with, or are not covered in the official story as outlined in the delayed and underfunded 9/11 Commission Report.
 
Also of great interest are the significant numbers of professional interest groups mentioned in the reference section below who follow up on their own web sites.   

 

Quotes quotes

"I disagree 100% with the government story. I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower. And I contacted NIST previously four times without a response. Finally, this week I asked them before they came up with their conclusion that jet fuel brought down the towers, if they ever considered my statements or the statements of any of the other survivors who heard the explosions. They just stared at me with blank faces and didn't have any answers."

William Rodriguez,  WTC Building Maintenance , WTC hero, “Last survivor out of WTC collapses”

 

"Recent research proves that explosives were used at the World Trade Center.  Flight paths and maneuvers of the aircraft involved at the Pentagon and Shanksville do not match NTSB released flight data recordings.  Shouldn't there be a criminal investigation before more lives and trillions of dollars are wasted?"

Major Jon I. Fox, U.S. Marine Corps, June 03, 2008 – Former Marine Corps fighter pilot, including interceptor pilot .  Retired commercial airline pilot, Continental Airlines.  Aircraft flown: Boeing 727,  DC-10, LearJet.  35-year commercial aviation career.

 

"The many visual images (massive structural members being hurled horizontally, huge pyroclastic clouds, etc.) leave no doubt in my mind explosives were involved [in the destruction of the World Trade Center]."

Dwain Deets, MS Physics, MS Eng  – Former Director, Aerospace Projects, NASA Dryden Flight Research Center. Director, Research Engineering Division at Dryden. Former Chairman of the Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee , 37 year NASA career.

General Industry Topics

go to top of page

A number of great videos are pre-loaded in the above player and are not listed below. You may hit play to view them sequentially or click the menu button (to the right of the player’s play button) to select the video you want to watch.

When the VideoLink symbol is clicked in the list below, a direct link to the described video is brought up in a new window.

The Truth and Lies of 9/11 : very informative video worth the time to watch.
VideoLink 2 hr. 17 min.
 
9/11 In Plane Site : well produced documentary focusing on what hit the Pentagon, and WTC towers. Recommended.
VideoLink 72 min.
 
Links to Iraq : the efforts to link Iraq to 9/11 terrorists. PBS.
VideoLink 8 min.
 
Doubts about Terrorist Pilots - AF Pilot does not believe terrorists could have flown some planes.
VideoLink 1 min.
 
Interview with Lt. Col Jeff Latas : phone discussion regarding 9/11, conflicts between the flight data recorder information and the official accounts.
VideoLink 28 min.
 
Interview with Lt. Col Guy Razer : phone discussion regarding NORAD, defense protocols, etc. around 9/11.
VideoLink 30 min.
 
9/11 Mysteries : well constructed  film focusing on the crashes of 9/11 and evidence of demolition. Recommended.
VideoLink 1 hr. 31 min.
 
Countdown to Bringing Down WTC7? - an EMT describes what he heard in the minutes before WTC #7 fell into it’s own footprint.
VideoLink 4 min.
 
9/11: Press for Truth? - excellent film on the 4 widows who lost their husbands in the WTC collapses who came to be known as The Jersey Girls. Valuable information on how they pressed politicians and administration to investigate 9/11. Highly recommended.
VideoLink 1 hr 24 min
 

go to top of page

Building a Better Mirage - Jim Huffman’s in-depth analysis of NIST’s report on the WTC collapses. Recommended. Web Page

9/11 Commission Mandate - FAQ on the commission’s work and deliverables  Web Page

9/11 Widows Want New Investigation - the Jersey Girls” verify the conflict of interest with 9/11 Commission Exec Philip Zelikow and his connections to the Bush administration. Raw Story - Feb, 2008 - Article

Collapse Reported 20 min Early - another coincidence on 9/11 was the BBC reporting live in NYC that WTC7 has collapsed...20 minutes prior to it actually collapsing. Web page

Beneficiaries - who stood to benefit? Web Page

Thermite/Thermate - images of WTC steel, and 2 short videos of shaped charge explosions: one is a demo, the other at WTC on 9/11. Web Page

Destruction of the WTCs - why the official account cannot be true, by author David Ray Griffin. Web page

Seismology - the seismology readings for the 2 impacts and 3 WTC building collapses. Web page

Top 40 Reasons : to doubt the official theory of 911 Article

A Half Dozen Questions About 911 - excellent questions that extend beyond controlled demolition, un-intercepted jets and the like. Article

Insider Trading days before 911 : put options executed on United and American airlines. Article

Wordpress 9/11 - Blog

Did AA11 and AA77 flights even exist on 9/11? : analysis of the tail numbers and the BTS database reveals doubt. Analysis

Coincidence - a secret drill by a private firm on 7/7 in London practicing for a near identicial scenario to the bombings that occurred the same dayWeb Page

 

 

go to top of page

Be sure to check these professional groups out for their respected analysis and areas of concern of 9/11:
 
Patriots Question 9/11
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Scientists - Journal of 9/11 Studies
Pilots for 9/11 Truth
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth
Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Researchers - Complete 9/11 Timeline
 
 
 

General Industry Topics

go to top of page

A number of videos are preloaded in the above player and are not listed below. You may hit play to view them sequentially or click the menu button (to the right of the player’s play button) to select the video you want to watch.

When the VideoLink symbol is clicked in the list below, a direct link to the described video is brought up in a new window.

Michael Meacher and Andreas Von Bulow - two prominent European politicians speak about 9/11. Recommended. Sep 2005
VideoLink 16 min.
 
 

go to top of page

 
UK: The Pakistan connection - foreign intelligence backing for 9/11 covered up by the US. Guardian, Jul 2004, Article
 
UK: This War on Terrorism is Bogus - Michael Meacher, Former UK Environment Minister (1997-2003), and Member of Parliament has reasons not to believe Washington’s official theory. Guardian, Sep 2003 Article
 
 
 
 
Top 
 
Google

search results are displayed in new window

 

Polls

Polls will show current results when your answers are submitted. Actual poll results will be sent to all those on our mailing list when new polls are started and old ones archived.

archive

 

Got something to say? go to top of page Got something to say?
All opinions are welcome no matter what you believe. Make sure to include your email address if you want replies to your comment automatically sent to you. Otherwise, an email address is not needed. You may choose to sort the chronology of the comments in a different order via the controls link.
 
 

 

Go to top of page

 

“The issue of knowing who was really behind the 9/11 attacks is of paramount importance to the future of our country, because the "official" assumption that it was the work of 19 Arab amateurs (1) does not match the available facts and (2) has led directly to the deplorable Patriot Act, the illegal Iraq war, NSA spying on ordinary Americans, repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, and the repeal of habeas corpus (a fundamental point of law that has been with us since the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215).

Surely these Orwellian consequences of public ignorance constitute more than sufficient motivation for any patriotic American physicist or engineer to join the search for 9/11 Truth!"

David L. Griscom, PhD, Jan 05, 2007  – Research physicist, retired, 2001, Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) in Washington, DC, after 33 years service.  Fellow of the American Physical Society. Adjunct Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Arizona (2004 - 2005).  Winner of the 1993 N. F. Mott Award sponsored by the Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, the 1995 Otto Schott Award offered by the Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung (Germany), a 1996 Outstanding Graduate School Alumnus Award at Brown University, and the 1997 Sigma Xi Pure Science Award at NRL

 

"It has long been clear that the Bush-Cheney administration cynically exploited the attacks of 9/11 to promote its imperial designs. But the present volume confronts us with compelling evidence for an even more disturbing conclusion: that the 9/11 attacks were themselves orchestrated by this administration precisely so they could be thus exploited. If this is true, it is not merely the case, as the Downing Street memos show, that the stated reason for attacking Iraq was a lie. It is also the case that the whole 'war on terror' was based on a prior deception."

Raymond L. McGovern Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates, Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer, 27-year CIA veteran. Responsible for preparing the President’ Daily Brief (PDB) for Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush. .

 


“I think the 9/11 Commission has taught me that we need to be extremely rigorous and extremely tenacious in pursuing that truth, because there is a corporate mentality in this country that is working against allowing the truth to surface, even in tragedies, such as the 9/11 tragedy. ...

I want to talk about the Commission itself, about the flawed process of the Commission and finally about the conflict of interest within the Commission that is extremely important to understand the failure of the Commission. ...

The most important individual to me, other than a commissioner, was the staff director, Philip Zelikow. His conflicts of interest were so great that you do have to wonder why this individual was appointed to head this important staff of over 80 people.

He had very strong ties to the George Herbert Walker Bush Administration. Very strong personal and political and policy ties to Condoleeza Rice.

More importantly, Philip Zelikow was running the case study program at Harvard, which took millions of dollars from the Central Intelligence Agency over a ten year period to write case studies on the CIA to establish a record that was essentially untrue with the facts about the work of the CIA. ...

The final report is ultimately a coverup.  I don't know how else to describe the final report."

Melvin A. Goodman, PhD, July 22, 2005, Former Division Chief and Senior Analyst at the Office of Soviet Affairs, CIA, 1966-1990. Senior Analyst at the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, State Department, 1974 - 1976. Professor of International Security at the National War College 1986 - 2004. 42-year Federal government career, primarily with the CIA, Department of Defense and State Department.  Currently Senior Fellow at the Center for International Policy and Adjunct Professor of Government at Johns Hopkins University

 

"I find your report seriously flawed in its failure to address serious intelligence issues that I am aware of, which have been confirmed, and which as a witness to the commission, I made you aware of. Thus, I must assume that other serious issues that I am not aware of were in the same manner omitted from your report. These omissions cast doubt on the validity of your report and therefore on its conclusions and recommendations."

Sibel D. Edmonds, Aug 1, 2004 –  Former FBI Language Translation Specialist , performing translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations. Witness before the 9/11 Commission. Quote from her letter to the 9/11 Commission.

 

"One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?"

Major General Albert Stubblebine, Jul 07, 2006, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981-1984 .  Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career. Member, Military Intelligence Hall of Fame.

 

Top